The development of shock resistant mounts for the escapement in rugged field watches

The rhythmic heartbeat of a mechanical watch originates from a tiny, intricate assembly of components known as the escapement. At its core is the balance wheel, oscillating back and forth with incredible precision, its motion regulated by a delicate hairspring. The pivots of the balance staff, the axle upon which this wheel turns, are microscopically fine, often thinner than a human hair. This inherent delicacy makes them the Achilles’ heel of any timepiece. A short drop onto a hard surface can generate enough G-force to bend or shatter these pivots, instantly silencing the watch. For a “field watch,” a timepiece designed for the rigors of exploration, military use, or any demanding environment, protecting this vital organ is not just a feature; it is its entire reason for being.

The Dawn of Shock Protection

The quest to build a more resilient watch is nearly as old as watchmaking itself. The legendary Abraham-Louis Breguet, a horological innovator of the late 18th century, was one of the first to tackle the problem directly. Around 1790, he developed what he called the “pare-chute,” which translates to “parachute.” This wasn’t a device to slow the watch’s fall, but rather a clever system to cushion the landing. Breguet redesigned the balance pivot to be conical and held it in place with a spring-loaded, dish-shaped component. Upon impact, the cone shape would allow the staff to move slightly, and the spring would absorb the energy, preventing the pivot from fracturing. It was a revolutionary concept for its time, laying the conceptual groundwork for all future shock protection systems.

Despite Breguet’s early success, these systems were complex to manufacture and remained confined to high-end pocket watches. For over a century, the majority of timepieces remained fragile. The transition from the pocket to the wrist during the early 20th century only exacerbated the problem. A watch worn on an active wrist is subjected to far more frequent and unpredictable shocks than one safely tucked away in a waistcoat. A new, more robust, and easily mass-produced solution was desperately needed.

The Incabloc Revolution

The breakthrough arrived in 1933, thanks to Swiss engineers Georges Braunschweig and Fritz Marti. They invented the Incabloc shock protection system, a design so effective and elegant that it fundamentally changed watchmaking and remains in widespread use today. The system’s genius lies in its integrated design. The delicate jewels that support the balance staff’s pivots are not fixed directly into the movement plate. Instead, they are mounted within a movable block, or “chaton.”

The Incabloc system’s defining feature is its distinctive lyre-shaped flat spring. This spring securely clips over the entire assembly, holding the cap jewel and the movable chaton in place. During a shock, this spring allows the whole unit to shift, absorbing the energy. After the event, the spring’s unique shape precisely guides the chaton and its jewels back to their central position, maintaining the watch’s accuracy.

Incabloc’s design protected the balance staff from both axial (up-and-down) and radial (side-to-side) shocks. It was relatively simple to manufacture, easy for watchmakers to service, and incredibly reliable. Its adoption by the Swiss watch industry was swift and widespread. By the mid-20th century, seeing the Incabloc lyre-shaped spring through a watch’s case back, or seeing the word “Incabloc” printed on the dial, became a powerful marketing tool and a genuine assurance of a watch’s durability.

Rivals and Alternatives

The success of Incabloc inevitably spawned a host of competitors, each offering a slightly different take on the same core principle of a movable jewel setting. These systems became hallmarks of different watch manufacturers and movement producers.

  • Kif: A major competitor, Kif shock protection is often found in higher-end movements from brands like Jaeger-LeCoultre and Patek Philippe. Its spring is typically a three-pronged or four-pronged clip, which some argue provides a more secure and larger contact area for retaining the jewel setting. Servicing a Kif system requires a specific tool for removing and reinstalling the spring.
  • Etachoc: This system was developed by ETA SA, one of the largest Swiss movement manufacturers. Etachoc is a more cost-effective design, characterized by a simple two-pronged symmetrical fork that can be turned to release the jewels. Its simplicity and low cost made it ubiquitous in countless workhorse ETA movements found in a vast range of watches.
  • Diashock: This is the proprietary shock protection system developed by Seiko in Japan. Its design is visually distinct, often resembling a three-petaled flower. Functionally, it operates on the same principles as its Swiss counterparts, showcasing Seiko’s commitment to in-house manufacturing and engineering for all its components.

Modern Materials and Integrated Designs

While the fundamental principles established by Incabloc and its peers remain the standard, modern horology has continued to refine and improve upon them. The focus has shifted towards using advanced materials and creating proprietary, high-performance systems integrated into the movement’s architecture from the ground up.

A prime example is Rolex’s Paraflex system, introduced in 2005. Rolex claims its proprietary spring geometry, which folds back on itself, increases shock resistance by up to 50% compared to traditional systems. The shape is designed not only to absorb impacts more effectively but also to ensure a more reliable and secure return-to-center for the balance staff, further protecting the watch’s chronometric performance. Similarly, brands like Omega have developed systems like Nivashoc, which are integral to their advanced Co-Axial movements.

The evolution of shock protection for the escapement is a perfect microcosm of the development of the rugged field watch itself. It’s a story of identifying a critical weakness and applying decades of iterative engineering to solve it. From Breguet’s clever cone to the modern marvels of integrated design, these tiny, often-unseen springs and blocks are what allow a precise mechanical instrument to survive in an imprecise world, keeping time reliably on the wrists of those who push the limits.

Julian Beckett, Horological Historian and Cultural Commentator

Julian Beckett is an accomplished Horological Historian and Cultural Commentator with over 18 years of dedicated experience researching, documenting, and sharing the intricate narratives of timepieces. He specializes in the cultural impact of watches, their mechanical evolution, and their significance in historical events and artistic movements, focusing on how these miniature marvels reflect and shape human civilization. Throughout his career, Julian has consulted for major auction houses, contributed to numerous books and exhibitions on horology, and lectured internationally on the art of watchmaking. He is known for his meticulous research and engaging storytelling, bringing to life the craftsmanship, innovation, and enduring legacy of iconic watches. Julian holds a Master’s degree in Cultural History and combines his profound academic expertise with an unparalleled passion for the precision, beauty, and stories embedded in every tick of a watch. He continues to contribute to the horological community through expert analyses, archival discoveries, and inspiring a deeper appreciation for the world of timekeeping.

Rate author
MagazineWatches
Add a comment